An aurora

An aurora is a natural light display in the sky (from the Latin word aurora, “sunrise” or the Roman goddess of dawn), especially in the high latitude (Arctic and Antarctic) regions, caused by the collision of solar wind and magnetospheric charged particles with the high altitude atmosphere (thermosphere). Most auroras occur in a band known as the auroral zone,[1][2] which is typically 3° to 6° wide in latitude and observed at 10° to 20° from the geomagnetic poles at all local times (or longitudes), but often most vividly around the spring and autumn equinoxes. The charged particles and solar wind are directed into the atmosphere by the Earth’s magnetosphere. Ageomagnetic storm expands the auroral zone to lower latitudes.aurora_photo


Auroras or aurorae[3] are classified as diffuse and discrete. The diffuse aurora is a featureless glow in the sky that may not be visible to the naked eye, even on a dark night. It defines the extent of the auroral zone. The discrete auroras are sharply defined features within the diffuse aurora that vary in brightness from just barely visible to the naked eye, to bright enough to read a newspaper by at night. Discrete auroras are usually seen in only the night sky, because they are not as bright as the sunlit sky. Auroras occasionally occur poleward of the auroral zone as diffuse patches or arcs,[4] which are generally subvisual.

In northern latitudes, the effect is known as the aurora borealis (or the northern lights), named after the Roman goddess of dawn, Aurora, and the Greek name for the north wind, Boreas, by Galileo in 1619.[5] Auroras seen near the magnetic pole may be high overhead, but from farther away, they illuminate the northern horizon as a greenish glow or sometimes a faint red, as if the Sun were rising from an unusual direction. Discrete auroras often display magnetic field lines or curtain-like structures, and can change within seconds or glow unchanging for hours, most often in fluorescent green. The aurora borealis most often occurs near the equinoxes. The northern lights have had a number of names throughout history. The Cree call this phenomenon the “Dance of the Spirits“. In Medieval Europe, the auroras were commonly believed to be a sign from God.[6]

Its southern counterpart, the aurora australis (or the southern lights), has features that are almost identical to the aurora borealis and changes simultaneously with changes in the northern auroral zone.[7] It is visible from high southern latitudes in AntarcticaSouth AmericaNew Zealand, and Australia. Auroras occur on other planets. Similar to the Earth’s aurora, they are visible close to the planet’s magnetic poles. Modern style guides recommend that the names of meteorological phenomena, such asaurora borealis, be uncapitalized.[8]

History of aurora theories[edit]

Multiple superstitions and obsolete theories explaining the aurora have surfaced over the centuries.

  • Seneca speaks diffusely on auroras in the first book of his Naturales Quaestiones, drawing mainly from Aristotle; he classifies them “putei” or wells when they are circular and “rim a large hole in the sky”, “pithaei” when they look like casks, “chasmata” from the same root of the English chasm, “pogoniae” when they are bearded, “cyparissae” when they look like cypresses), describes their manifold colors and asks himself whether they are above or below the clouds. He recalls that underTiberius, an aurora formed above Ostia, so intense and so red that a cohort of the army, stationed nearby for fireman duty, galloped to the city.
  • Walter William Bryant wrote in his book Kepler (1920) that Tycho Brahe “seems to have been something of a homœopathist, for he recommends sulfur to cure infectious diseases “brought on by the sulphurous vapours of the Aurora Borealis.”[9]
  • Benjamin Franklin theorized that the “mystery of the Northern Lights” was caused by a concentration of electrical charges in the polar regions intensified by the snow and other moisture.[10]
  • Auroral electrons come from beams emitted by the Sun. This was claimed around 1900 by Kristian Birkeland, whose experiments in a vacuum chamber with electron beams and magnetized spheres (miniature models of Earth or “terrellas”) showed that such electrons would be guided toward the polar regions. Problems with this model included absence of aurora at the poles themselves, self-dispersal of such beams by their negative charge, and more recently, lack of any observational evidence in space.
  • The aurora is the overflow of the radiation belt (“leaky bucket theory”). This was first disproved around 1962 by James Van Allen and co-workers, who showed that the high rate of energy dissipation by the aurora would quickly drain the radiation belt. Soon afterward, it became clear that most of the energy in trapped particles resided in positive ions, while auroral particles were almost always electrons, of relatively low energy.
  • The aurora is produced by solar wind particles guided by Earth’s field lines to the top of the atmosphere. This holds true for the cusp aurora, but outside the cusp, the solar wind has no direct access. In addition, the main energy in the solar wind resides in positive ions; electrons only have about 0.5 eV (electron volt), and while in the cusp this may be raised to 50–100 eV, that still falls short of auroral energies.

Auroral mechanism[edit]

Auroras are associated with the solar wind, a flow of ions continuously flowing outward from the Sun. The Earth’s magnetic field traps these particles, many of which travel toward the poles where they are accelerated toward Earth. Collisions between these ions and atmospheric atoms and molecules cause energy releases in the form of auroras appearing in large circles around the poles. Auroras are more frequent and brighter during the intense phase of the solar cycle when coronal mass ejectionsincrease the intensity of the solar wind.[11]

Auroras result from emissions of photons in the Earth’s upper atmosphere, above 80 km (50 mi), from ionized nitrogen molecules regaining an electron, and oxygenatoms and nitrogen molecules returning from an excited state to ground state.[12] They are ionized or excited by the collision of solar wind and magnetospheric particles being funneled down and accelerated along the Earth’s magnetic field lines; excitation energy is lost by the emission of a photon, or by collision with another atom or molecule:

oxygen emissions
green or orange-red, depending on the amount of energy absorbed.
nitrogen emissions
blue or red; blue if the atom regains an electron after it has been ionized, red if returning to ground state from an excited state.

Oxygen is unusual in terms of its return to ground state: it can take three quarters of a second to emit green light and up to two minutes to emit red. Collisions with other atoms or molecules absorb the excitation energy and prevent emission. Because the very top of the atmosphere has a higher percentage of oxygen and is sparsely distributed such collisions are rare enough to allow time for oxygen to emit red. Collisions become more frequent progressing down into the atmosphere, so that red emissions do not have time to happen, and eventually even green light emissions are prevented.

This is why there is a color differential with altitude; at high altitude oxygen red dominates, then oxygen green and nitrogen blue/red, then finally nitrogen blue/red when collisions prevent oxygen from emitting anything. Green is the most common of all auroras. Behind it is pink, a mixture of light green and red, followed by pure red, yellow (a mixture of red and green), and finally, pure blue.

Auroral colors[edit]

  • Red: At the highest altitudes, excited atomic oxygen emits at 630.0 nm (red); low concentration of atoms and lower sensitivity of eyes at this wavelength make this color visible only under some circumstances with more intense solar activity. The low amount of oxygen atoms and their very gradually diminishing concentration is responsible for the faint, gradual appearance of the top parts of the “curtains”.
  • Green: At lower altitudes the more frequent collisions suppress this mode and the 557.7 nm emission (green) dominates; fairly high concentration of atomic oxygen and higher eye sensitivity in green make green auroras the most common. The excited molecular nitrogen (atomic nitrogen being rare due to high stability of the N2molecule) plays its role here as well, as it can transfer energy by collision to an oxygen atom, which then radiates it away at the green wavelength. (Red and green can also mix together to pink or yellow hues.) The rapid decrease of concentration of atomic oxygen below about 100 km is responsible for the abrupt-looking end of the bottom parts of the curtains.
  • Yellow and pink are a mix of red and green or blue.
  • Blue: At yet lower altitudes atomic oxygen is not common anymore, and ionized molecular nitrogen takes over in visible light emission; it radiates at a large number of wavelengths in both red and blue parts of the spectrum, with 428 nm (blue) being dominant. Blue and purple emissions, typically at the bottoms of the “curtains”, show up at the highest levels of solar activity.[13]

Forms and magnetism[edit]

Aurora timelapse video (40 minutes)

Northern lights over Calgary

The aurora appears frequently either as a diffuse glow or as “curtains” that approximately extend in the east-west direction. At some times, they form “quiet arcs”; at others (“active aurora”), they evolve and change constantly. Each curtain consists of many parallel rays, each lined up with the local direction of the magnetic field lines, suggesting that auroras are shaped by Earth’s magnetic field. Indeed, satellites show that electrons are guided by magnetic field lines, spiraling around them while moving toward Earth.

The similarity to curtains is often enhanced by folds called “striations”. When the field line guiding a bright auroral patch leads to a point directly above the observer, the aurora may appear as a “corona” of diverging rays, an effect of perspective.

Although it was first mentioned by Ancient Greek explorer/geographer PytheasHiorter and Celsius first described in 1741 evidence for magnetic control, namely, large magnetic fluctuations occurred whenever the aurora was observed overhead. This indicates (it was later realized) that large electric currents were associated with the aurora, flowing in the region where auroral light originated. Kristian Birkeland (1908)[14] deduced that the currents flowed in the east-west directions along the auroral arc, and such currents, flowing from the dayside toward (approximately) midnight were later named “auroral electrojets” (see alsoBirkeland currents).

Still more evidence for a magnetic connection are the statistics of auroral observations. Elias Loomis (1860) and later in more detail Hermann Fritz (1881)[15] and S. Tromholt (1882)[16] established that the aurora appeared mainly in the “auroral zone”, a ring-shaped region with a radius of approximately 2500 km around Earth’s magnetic pole. It was hardly ever seen near the geographic pole, which is about 2000 km away from the magnetic pole. The instantaneous distribution of auroras (“auroral oval”[1][2]) is slightly different, centered about 3–5 degrees nightward of the magnetic pole, so that auroral arcs reach furthest toward the equator when the magnetic pole in question is in between the observer and the Sun. The aurora can be seen best at this time, called magnetic midnight.

In the 1970s, astrophysicist Joan Feynman deduced that auroras are a product of the interaction between the Earth’s magnetosphere and the magnetic field of the solar wind.[17] Her work resulted from data collected by the Explorer 33 spacecraft.[18]

On 26 February 2008, THEMIS probes were able to determine, for the first time, the triggering event for the onset of magnetospheric substorms.[19] Two of the five probes, positioned approximately one third the distance to the moon, measured events suggesting a magnetic reconnection event 96 seconds prior to auroral intensification.[20]Dr. Vassilis Angelopoulos of the University of California, Los Angeles, the principal investigator for the THEMIS mission, claimed, “Our data show clearly and for the first time that magnetic reconnection is the trigger.”[21]

Solar wind and the magnetosphere[edit]

Schematic of Earth’smagnetosphere

The Earth is constantly immersed in the solar wind, a rarefied flow of hot plasma (gas of free electrons and positive ions) emitted by the Sun in all directions, a result of the two-million-degree heat of the Sun’s outermost layer, the corona. The solar wind usually reaches Earth with a velocity around 400 km/s, density around 5 ions/cm3 and magnetic field intensity around 2–5 nT (nanoteslas; Earth’s surface field is typically 30,000–50,000 nT). These are typical values. During magnetic storms, in particular, flows can be several times faster; the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) may also be much stronger.

The IMF originates on the Sun, related to the field of sunspots, and its field lines (lines of force) are dragged out by the solar wind. That alone would tend to line them up in the Sun-Earth direction, but the rotation of the Sun skews them (at Earth) by about 45 degrees, so that field lines passing Earth may actually start near the western edge (“limb”) of the visible Sun.[22]

Earth’s magnetosphere is formed by the impact of the solar wind on the Earth’s magnetic field. It forms an obstacle to the solar wind, diverting it, at an average distance of about 70,000 km (11 Earth radii or Re),[23] forming a bow shock 12,000 km to 15,000 km (1.9 to 2.4 Re) further upstream. The width of the magnetosphere abreast of Earth, is typically 190,000 km (30 Re), and on the night side a long “magnetotail” of stretched field lines extends to great distances (> 200 Re).

The magnetosphere is full of trapped plasma as the solar wind passes the Earth. The flow of plasma into the magnetosphere increases with increases in solar wind density and speed, with increase in the southward component of the IMF and with increases in turbulence in the solar wind flow.[24] The flow pattern of magnetospheric plasma is from the magnetotail toward the Earth, around the Earth and back into the solar wind through the magnetopause on the day-side. In addition to moving perpendicular to the Earth’s magnetic field, some magnetospheric plasma travel down along the Earth’s magnetic field lines and lose energy to the atmosphere in the auroral zones. Magnetospheric electrons accelerated downward by field-aligned electric fields cause the bright aurora features. The un-accelerated electrons and ions cause the dim glow of the diffuse aurora.

Frequency of occurrence[edit]

Kp map of North America
North America
Kp map of Eurasia
These NOAA maps of North America and Eurasia show the local midnight equatorward boundary of the aurora at different levels of geomagnetic activity; a Kp=3 corresponds to low levels of geomagnetic activity, while Kp=9 represents high levels

Auroras are occasionally seen in temperate latitudes, when a magnetic storm temporarily enlarges the auroral oval. Large magnetic storms are most common during the peak of the eleven-year sunspot cycle or during the three years after that peak.[25][26] Within the auroral zone the likelihood of an aurora occurring depends mostly on the slant of interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) lines (the slant is known as Bz), however, being greater with southward slants.

Geomagnetic storms that ignite auroras actually happen more often during the months around the equinoxes. It is not well understood why geomagnetic storms are tied to Earth’s seasons while polar activity is not. But it is known that during spring and autumn, the interplanetary magnetic field and that of Earth link up. At the magnetopause, Earth’s magnetic field points north. When Bz becomes large and negative (i.e., the IMF tilts south), it can partially cancel Earth’s magnetic field at the point of contact. South-pointing Bzs open a door through which energy from the solar wind reaches Earth’s inner magnetosphere.

The peaking of Bz during this time is a result of geometry. The IMF comes from the Sun and is carried outward with the solar wind. The rotation of the Sun causes the IMF to have a spiral shape called the Parker spiral. The southward (and northward) excursions of Bz are greatest during April and October, when Earth’s magnetic dipole axis is most closely aligned with the Parker spiral.

Bz is not the only influence on geomagnetic activity, however, the Sun’s rotation axis is tilted 8 degrees with respect to the plane of Earth’s orbit. The solar wind blows more rapidly from the Sun’s poles than from its equator, thus the average speed of particles buffeting Earth’s magnetosphere waxes and wanes every six months. The solar wind speed is greatest – by about 50 km/s, on average – around 5 September and 5 March when Earth lies at its highest heliographic latitude.

Still, neither Bz nor the solar wind can fully explain the seasonal behavior of geomagnetic storms. Those factors together contribute only about one-third of the observed semiannual variations.

Auroral events of historical significance[edit]

The auroras that resulted from the “great geomagnetic storm” on both 28 August and 2 September 1859 are thought the most spectacular in recent recorded history. In a paper to the Royal Society on 21 November 1861, Scottish physicist Balfour Stewart described both auroral events as documented by a self-recording magnetograph at the Kew Observatory and established the connection between the 2 September 1859 auroral storm and the Carrington-Hodgson flare event when he observed that, “It is not impossible to suppose that in this case our luminary was taken in the act.”[27][28] The second auroral event, which occurred on 2 September 1859 as a result of the exceptionally intense Carrington-Hodgson white light solar flare on 1 September 1859, produced auroras so widespread and extraordinarily brilliant that they were seen and reported in published scientific measurements, ship logs, and newspapers throughout the United StatesEuropeJapan, and Australia. It was reported by the New York Times[29][30][31] that in Boston on Friday 2 September 1859 the aurora was “so brilliant that at about one o’clock ordinary print could be read by the light“.[30][32][33] One o’clock EST time on Friday 2 September, would have been 6:00 GMT and the self-recording magnetograph at the Kew Observatory was recording the geomagnetic storm, which was then one hour old, at its full intensity. Between 1859 and 1862, Elias Loomis published a series of nine papers on the Great Auroral Exhibition of 1859 in theAmerican Journal of Science where he collected world-wide reports of the auroral event.

The aurora is thought to have been produced by one of the most intense coronal mass ejections in history, very near the maximum intensity that the Sun is thought capable of producing. It is also notable for the fact that it is the first time where the phenomena of auroral activity and electricity were unambiguously linked. This insight was made possible not only due to scientific magnetometer measurements of the era, but also as a result of a significant portion of the 125,000 miles (201,000 km) oftelegraph lines then in service being significantly disrupted for many hours throughout the storm. Some telegraph lines, however, seem to have been of the appropriate length and orientation to produce a sufficient geomagnetically induced current from the electromagnetic field to allow for continued communication with the telegraph operator power supplies switched off. The following conversation occurred between two operators of the American Telegraph Line between Boston and Portland, Maine, on the night of 2 September 1859 and reported in the Boston Traveler:

Boston operator (to Portland operator): “Please cut off your battery [power source] entirely for fifteen minutes.”

Portland operator: “Will do so. It is now disconnected.”
Boston: “Mine is disconnected, and we are working with the auroral current. How do you receive my writing?”
Portland: “Better than with our batteries on. – Current comes and goes gradually.”
Boston: “My current is very strong at times, and we can work better without the batteries, as the aurora seems to neutralize and augment our batteries alternately, making current too strong at times for our relay magnets. Suppose we work without batteries while we are affected by this trouble.”
Portland: “Very well. Shall I go ahead with business?”
Boston: “Yes. Go ahead.”

The conversation was carried on for around two hours using no battery power at all and working solely with the current induced by the aurora, and it was said that this was the first time on record that more than a word or two was transmitted in such manner.[32] Such events led to the general conclusion that

The effect of the aurorae on the electric telegraph is generally to increase or diminish the electric current generated in working the wires. Sometimes it entirely neutralizes them, so that, in effect, no fluid is discoverable in them. The aurora borealis seems to be composed of a mass of electric matter, resembling in every respect, that generated by the electric galvanic battery. The currents from it change coming on the wires, and then disappear: the mass of the aurora rolls from the horizon to the zenith.[34]


Aurora australis (11 September 2005) as captured by NASA’s IMAGEsatellite, digitally overlaid onto The Blue Marble composite image An animation created using the same satellite data is also available

The ultimate energy source of the aurora is the solar wind flowing past the Earth. The magnetosphere and solar wind consist ofplasma (ionized gas), which conducts electricity. It is well known (since Michael Faraday‘s work around 1830) that when an electrical conductor is placed within a magnetic field while relative motion occurs in a direction that the conductor cuts across(or is cut by), rather than along, the lines of the magnetic field, an electric current is said to be induced into that conductor and electrons flow within it. The amount of current flow is dependent upon a) the rate of relative motion, b) the strength of the magnetic field, c) the number of conductors ganged together and d) the distance between the conductor and the magnetic field, while the direction of flow is dependent upon the direction of relative motion. Dynamos make use of this basic process (“thedynamo effect“), any and all conductors, solid or otherwise are so affected including plasmas or other fluids.

In particular the solar wind and the magnetosphere are two electrically conducting fluids with such relative motion and should be able (in principle) to generate electric currents by “dynamo action”, in the process also extracting energy from the flow of the solar wind. The process is hampered by the fact that plasmas conduct easily along magnetic field lines, but not so easily perpendicular to them. So it is important that a temporary magnetic connection be established between the field lines of the solar wind and those of the magnetosphere, by a process known as magnetic reconnection. It happens most easily with a southward slant of interplanetary field lines, because then field lines north of Earth approximately match the direction of field lines near the north magnetic pole (namely, into Earth), and similarly near the south magnetic pole. Indeed, active auroras (and related “substorms”) are much more likely at such times. Electric currents originating in such way apparently give auroral electrons their energy. The magnetospheric plasma has an abundance of electrons: some are magnetically trapped, some reside in the magnetotail, and some exist in the upward extension of the ionosphere, which may extend (with diminishing density) some 25,000 km around Earth.

Bright auroras are generally associated with Birkeland currents (Schield et al., 1969;[35] Zmuda and Armstrong, 1973[36]) which flow down into the ionosphere on one side of the pole and out on the other. In between, some of the current connects directly through the ionospheric E layer (125 km); the rest (“region 2”) detours, leaving again through field lines closer to the equator and closing through the “partial ring current” carried by magnetically trapped plasma. The ionosphere is an ohmic conductor, so such currents require a driving voltage, which some dynamo mechanism can supply. Electric field probes in orbit above the polar cap suggest voltages of the order of 40,000 volts, rising up to more than 200,000 volts during intense magnetic storms.

Ionospheric resistance has a complex nature, and leads to a secondary Hall current flow. By a strange twist of physics, the magnetic disturbance on the ground due to the main current almost cancels out, so most of the observed effect of auroras is due to a secondary current, the auroral electrojet. An auroral electrojet index (measured in nanotesla) is regularly derived from ground data and serves as a general measure of auroral activity.

Ohmic resistance is not the only obstacle to current flow in this circuit, however, the convergence of magnetic field lines near Earth creates a “mirror effect” that turns back most of the down-flowing electrons (where currents flow upward), inhibiting current-carrying capacity. To overcome this, part of the available voltage appears along the field line (“parallel to the field”), helping electrons overcome that obstacle by widening the bundle of trajectories reaching Earth; a similar “parallel potential” is used in “tandem mirror” plasma containment devices. A feature of such voltage is that it is concentrated near Earth (potential proportional to field intensity; Persson, 1963[37]), and indeed, as deduced by Evans (1974) and confirmed by satellites, most auroral acceleration occurs below 10,000 km. Another indicator of parallel electric fields along field lines are beams of upward flowing O+ ions observed on auroral field lines.

ISS Expedition 6 team, Lake Manicouagan is visible to the bottom left

Some O+ ions (“conics”) also seem accelerated in different ways by plasma processes associated with the aurora. These ions are accelerated by plasma waves, in directions mainly perpendicular to the field lines. They therefore start at their own “mirror points” and can travel only upward. As they do so, the “mirror effect” transforms their directions of motion, from perpendicular to the line to lying on a cone around it, which gradually narrows down.

In addition, the aurora and associated currents produce a strong radio emission around 150 kHz known as auroral kilometric radiation (AKR, discovered in 1972). Ionospheric absorption makes AKR observable from space only.

These “parallel potentials” accelerate electrons to auroral energies and seem to be a major source of aurora. Other mechanisms have also been proposed, in particular, Alfvén waves, wave modes involving the magnetic field first noted byHannes Alfvén (1942), which have been observed in the lab and in space. The question is whether these waves might just be a different way of looking at the above process, however, because this approach does not point out a different energy source, and many plasma bulk phenomena can also be described in terms of Alfvén waves.

Other processes are also involved in the aurora, and much remains to be learned. Auroral electrons created by large geomagnetic storms often seem to have energies below 1 keV, and are stopped higher up, near 200 km. Such low energies excite mainly the red line of oxygen, so that often such auroras are red. On the other hand, positive ions also reach the ionosphere at such time, with energies of 20–30 keV, suggesting they might be an “overflow” along magnetic field lines of the copious “ring current” ions accelerated at such times, by processes different from the ones described above.

Sources and types[edit]

Our scientific understanding of auroras’ causes is very incomplete. There are three possible main sources:

  1. Dynamo action with the solar wind flowing past Earth, possibly producing quiet auroral arcs (“directly driven” process). The circuit of the accelerating currents and their connection to the solar wind are uncertain.
  2. Dynamo action involving plasma squeezed toward Earth by sudden convulsions of the magnetotail (“magnetic substorms”). Substorms tend to occur after prolonged spells (hours) during which the interplanetary magnetic field has an appreciable southward component, leading to a high rate of interconnection between its field lines and those of Earth. As a result the solar wind moves magnetic flux (tubes of magnetic field lines, moving together with their resident plasma) from the day side of Earth to the magnetotail, widening the obstacle it presents to the solar wind flow and causing it to be squeezed harder. Ultimately the tail plasma is torn (“magnetic reconnection“); some blobs (“plasmoids“) are squeezed tailward and are carried away with the solar wind; others are squeezed toward Earth where their motion feeds large outbursts of aurora, mainly around midnight (“unloading process”). Geomagnetic storms have similar effects, but with greater vigor. The big difference is the addition of many particles to the plasma trapped around Earth, enhancing the “ring current” it carries. The resulting modification of Earth’s field makes auroras visible at middle latitudes, on field lines much closer to the equator.
  3. Satellite images of the aurora from above show a “ring of fire” along the auroral oval (see above), often widest at midnight. That is the “diffuse aurora”, not distinct enough to see with the eye. It does not seem associated with acceleration by electric currents (although currents and their arcs may be embedded in it) but appears to be due to electrons that leak out of the magnetotail.

Any magnetic trapping is leaky—there always exists a bundle of directions (“loss cone”) around the guiding magnetic field lines where particles are not trapped but escape. In the radiation belts of Earth, once particles on such trajectories are gone, new ones only replace them very slowly, leaving such directions nearly “empty”. In the magnetotail, however, particle trajectories seem to constantly reshuffle, probably when the particles cross the very weak field near the equator. As a result, the flow of electrons in all directions is nearly the same (“isotropic”), and that assures a steady supply of leaking electrons.

The energization of such electrons comes from magnetotail processes. The leakage of negative electrons does not leave the tail positively charged, because each leaked electron lost to the atmosphere is quickly replaced by a low energy electron drawn upward from the ionosphere. Such replacement of “hot” electrons by “cold” ones is in complete accord with the 2nd law of thermodynamics.

Other types of auroras have been observed from space, e.g.[citation needed] “poleward arcs” stretching sunward across the polar cap, the related “theta aurora”, and “dayside arcs” near noon. These are relatively infrequent and poorly understood. There are other interesting effects such as flickering aurora, “black aurora” and subvisual red arcs. In addition to all these, a weak glow (often deep red) has been observed around the two polar cusps, the “funnels” of field lines separating the ones that close on the day side of Earth from lines swept into the tail. The cusps allow a small amount of solar wind to reach the top of the atmosphere, producing an auroral glow.

Sounds associated with auroras[edit]

Folktales and travelers’ tales say that the aurora can generate noise such as claps, crackles, and static sounds, usually faint and brief.[38] For a long time scientists were dubious, since sound has been hard to document, and auroral displays themselves are too high in the sky for them to be heard on the ground.[39] However, researchers from Aalto University in Finland published a study in 2012 saying that they recorded “clapping” sounds correlated to the visual presence of the aurora borealis, and that these sounds were produced approximately 70 metres (230 ft) above ground.[40] They suggested that these sounds come from the solar particles associated with creating the aurora.[41] The University of Alaska notes that aurora noise is so rare that hearing it is a “once in a lifetime experience”, possible only during times of maximum aurora activity, on windless nights away from other noise sources.[42]


25-second exposure of the aurora australis from Amundsen-Scott S.P.S.

Images of auroras are significantly more common today due to the rise of use of digital cameras that have high enough sensitivities.[43] Film and digital exposure to auroral displays is fraught with difficulties, particularly if faithfulness of reproduction is an objective. Due to the different spectral energy present, and changing dynamically throughout the exposure, the results are somewhat unpredictable. Different layers of the film emulsion respond differently to lower light levels, and choice of film can be very important. Longer exposures aggregate the rapidly changing energy and often blanket the dynamic attribute of a display. Higher sensitivity creates issues with graininess.

David Malin pioneered multiple exposure using multiple filters for astronomical photography, recombining the images in the laboratory to recreate the visual display more accurately.[44] For scientific research, proxies are often used, such as ultra-violet, and re-colored to simulate the appearance to humans. Predictive techniques are also used, to indicate the extent of the display, a highly useful tool for aurora hunters.[45] Terrestrial features often find their way into aurora images, making them more accessible and more likely to be published by major websites.[46] It is possible to take excellent images with standard film (using ISO ratings between 100 and 400) and asingle-lens reflex camera with full aperture, a fast lens (f1.4 50 mm, for example), and exposures between 10 and 30 seconds, depending on the aurora’s display strength.[47]

Early work on the imaging of the auroras was done in 1949 by the University of Saskatchewan using the SCR-270 radar.

Red and green auroras, Norway

On other planets[edit]

Jupiter aurora; the bright spot at far left is the end of field line to Io; spots at bottom lead to Ganymedeand Europa

An aurora high above the northern part of Saturn; image taken by the Cassini spacecrafta movie(click on image), shows images from 81 hours of observations of Saturn’s aurora

Both Jupiter and Saturn have magnetic fields much stronger than Earth’s (Jupiter’s equatorial field strength is 4.3 gauss, compared to 0.3 gauss for Earth), and both have large radiation belts. Auroras have been observed on both, most clearly with the Hubble Space TelescopeUranus and Neptune have also been observed to have auroras.[48]

The auroras on the gas giants seem, like Earth’s, to be powered by the solar wind. In addition, however, Jupiter’s moons, especially Io, are powerful sources of auroras on Jupiter. These arise from electric currents along field lines (“field aligned currents”), generated by a dynamo mechanism due to the relative motion between the rotating planet and the moving moon. Io, which has active volcanism and an ionosphere, is a particularly strong source, and its currents also generate radio emissions, studied since 1955. Auroras also have been observed on the surfaces of Io, Europa, and Ganymede, using the Hubble Space Telescope. These auroras have also been observed on Venus and Mars. Because Venus has no intrinsic (planetary) magnetic field, Venusian auroras appear as bright and diffuse patches of varying shape and intensity, sometimes distributed across the full planetary disc. Venusian auroras are produced by the impact of electrons originating from the solar wind and precipitating in the night-side atmosphere. An aurora was also detected on Mars, on 14 August 2004, by the SPICAM instrument aboard Mars Express. The aurora was located at Terra Cimmeria, in the region of 177° East, 52° South. The total size of the emission region was about 30 km across, and possibly about 8 km high. By analyzing a map of crustal magnetic anomalies compiled with data from Mars Global Surveyor, scientists observed that the region of the emissions corresponded to an area where the strongest magnetic field is localized. This correlation indicates that the origin of the light emission was a flux of electrons moving along the crust magnetic lines and exciting the upper atmosphere of Mars.[48][49]

In traditional and popular culture[edit]

In Bulfinch’s Mythology from 1855 by Thomas Bulfinch there is the claim that in Norse mythology:

The Valkyrior are warlike virgins, mounted upon horses and armed with helmets and spears. /…/ When they ride forth on their errand, their armour sheds a strange flickering light, which flashes up over the northern skies, making what Men call the “aurora borealis”, or “Northern Lights”.[50]

Frederic Edwin Church‘s 1865 painting “Aurora Borealis”

While a striking notion, there is not a vast body of evidence in the Old Norse literature supporting this assertion. Although auroral activity is common over Scandinavia and Iceland today, it is possible that the Magnetic North Pole was considerably farther away from this region during the centuries before the documentation of Norse mythology, thus explaining the lack of references.[51]

The first Old Norse account of norðrljós is found in the Norwegian chronicle Konungs Skuggsjá from AD 1230. The chronicler has heard about this phenomenon from compatriots returning from Greenland, and he gives three possible explanations: that the ocean was surrounded by vast fires, that the sun flares could reach around the world to its night side, or that glaciers could store energy so that they eventually became fluorescent.[52]

In ancient Roman mythology, Aurora is the goddess of the dawn, renewing herself every morning to fly across the sky, announcing the arrival of the sun. The persona of Aurora the goddess has been incorporated in the writings ofShakespeareLord Tennyson, and Thoreau.

In the traditions of Aboriginal Australians, the Aurora Australis is commonly associated with fire. For example, the Gunditjmara people of western Victoria called auroras “Puae buae”, meaning “ashes”, while the Gunai people of eastern Victoria perceived auroras as bushfires in the spirit world. When the Dieri people of South Australia said that an auroral display was “Kootchee”, an evil spirit creating a large fire. Similarly, the Ngarrindjeri people of South Australia referred to auroras seen over Kangaroo Island as the campfires of spirits in the ‘Land of the Dead’. Aboriginal people in southwest Queensland believed the auroras to be the fires of the “Oola Pikka”, ghostly spirits who spoke to the people through auroras. Sacred law forbade anyone except male elders from watching or interpreting the messages of ancestors they believed were transmitted through auroras.[53]

After the Battle of Fredericksburg, the lights could be seen from the battlefield that night. The Confederate Army took it as a sign that God was on their side during the battle as it was very rare that one could see the Lights in Virginia. The painting Aurora Borealis (see Aurora Borealis) (1865) by American landscape painter Frederic Edwin Church is widely interpreted to represent the conflict of the American Civil War.[54]

See also[edit]


  1. Jump up to:a b Feldstein, Y. I. (1963). “Some problems concerning the morphology of auroras and magnetic disturbances at high latitudes”. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy 3: 183–192. Bibcode:1963Ge&Ae…3..183F.
  2. Jump up to:a b Feldstein, Y. I. (1986). “A Quarter Century with the Auroral Oval”. EOS 67(40): 761. Bibcode:1986EOSTr..67..761Fdoi:10.1029/EO067i040p00761-02.
  3. Jump up^
  4. Jump up^ Frey, H. U. (2007). “Localized aurora beyond the auroral oval”. Rev. Geophys. 45: RG1003. doi:10.1029/2005RG000174.
  5. Jump up^ George Siscoe (1986). An Historical Footnote on the Origin of Aurora Borealis, History of Geophysics 2, 11-14.
  6. Jump up^ Wilfried Schröder, Das Phänomen des Polarlichts, Darmstadt 1984
  7. Jump up^ N. Østgaard, S. B. Mende, H. U. Frey, J. B. Sigwarth, A. Asnes, J. M. Weygand (2007). “Auroral conjugacy studies based on global imaging”. J. Of Atmos. And Solar-Terres. Phys. 69 (3): 249–55.Bibcode:2007JASTP..69..249Odoi:10.1016/j.jastp.2006.05.026.
  8. Jump up^ “University of Minnesota Style Manual”. 18 July 2007.Archived from the original on 22 July 2010. Retrieved 5 August 2010.
  9. Jump up^ Walter William Bryant, Kepler Macmillan Co. (1920) p.23
  10. Jump up^ “Scientist and Inventor: Benjamin Franklin: In His Own Words… (AmericanTreasures of the Library of Congress)”. 16 August 2010.Archived from the original on 28 June 2011. Retrieved 26 July 2011.
  11. Jump up^ “NASA – NASA and World Book”. 7 February 2011. Archivedfrom the original on 29 June 2011. Retrieved 26 July 2011.[dead link]
  12. Jump up^ “Ultraviolet Waves”.
  13. Jump up^ “Windows to the Universe – Auroral colors and spectra”.
  14. Jump up^ Birkeland, Kristian (1908 (section 1), 1913 (section 2)). The Norwegian Aurora Polaris Expedition 1902–1903. New York: Christiania (Oslo): H. Aschehoug & Co. p. 720. out-of-print, full text online
  15. Jump up^ Fritz, Hermann (1881). “Das Polarlicht.”
  16. Jump up^ S. Tromholt, Om nordlysets perioder/Sur les périodes de l’aurore boréale, l’annuaire 1880, Inst. Météorol. Danois, Copenhagen, 1882.
  17. Jump up^ Crooker, N. U.; Feynman, J.; Gosling, J. T. (1 May 1977). “On the high correlation between long-term averages of solar wind speed and geomagnetic activity”. NASA.
  18. Jump up^ Hirshberg, Charles (18 April 2002). “My Mother, the Scientist”Popular Science. Bonnier Corporation.
  19. Jump up^ “NASA – THEMIS Satellites Discover What Triggers Eruptions of the Northern Lights”. Archived from the original on 29 June 2011. Retrieved 26 July 2011.
  20. Jump up^ Angelopoulos, V.; McFadden, J. P.; Larson, D.; Carlson, C. W.; Mende, S. B.; Frey, H.; Phan, T.; Sibeck, D. G.; Glassmeier, K.-H.; Auster, U.; Donovan, E.; Mann, I. R.; Rae, I. J.; Russell, C. T.; Runov, A.; Zhou, X.-Z.; Kepko, L. (2008). “Tail Reconnection Triggering Substorm Onset”. Science 321 (5891): 931–5.Bibcode:2008Sci…321..931Adoi:10.1126/science.1160495.PMID 18653845.
  21. Jump up^ “Secret of Colorful Auroras Revealed”. 24 July 2008.Archived from the original on 28 June 2011. Retrieved 26 July 2011.
  22. Jump up^, Solar wind forecast from a University of Alaska website
  23. Jump up^ Shue, J.-H; J .K. Chao, H .C. Fu, C. T. Russell, P. Song, K. K. Khurana, and H. J. Singer (May 1997). “A new functional form to study the solar wind control of the magnetopause size and shape”. J. Geophys. Res. 102 (A5): 9497–9511.Bibcode:1997JGR…102.9497Sdoi:10.1029/97JA00196.
  24. Jump up^ Lyons, L. R.; H.-J. Kim, X. Xing, S. Zou, D.-Y. Lee, C. Heinselman, M. J. Nicolls, V. Angelopoulos, D. Larson, J. McFadden, A. Runov, and K.-H. Fornacon (2009). “Evidence that solar wind fluctuations substantially affect global convection and substorm occurrence”. J. Geophys. Res. 114 (A11306): 1–14. Bibcode:2009JGRA..11411306Ldoi:10.1029/2009JA014281.
  25. Jump up^ Stamper, J.; M. Lockwood and M. N. Wild (December 1999). “Solar causes of the long-term increase in geomagnetic activity”. J. Geophys. Res. 104 (A12): 28,325–28,342. Bibcode:1999JGR…10428325S.doi:10.1029/1999JA900311.
  26. Jump up^ Papitashvili, V. O.; N. E. Papitashva and J .H . King (September 2000). “Solar cycle effects in planetary geomagnetic activity: Analysis of 36-year long OMNI dataset”. Geophys. Res. Lett. 27 (17): 2797–2800.Bibcode:2000GeoRL..27.2797Pdoi:10.1029/2000GL000064.
  27. Jump up^ Balfour Stewart (1860–1862). “On the Great Magnetic Disturbance of 28 August to 7 September 1859, as Recorded by Photography at the Kew Observatory”. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 11: 407–410.doi:10.1098/rspl.1860.0086JSTOR 111936.
  28. Jump up^ Balfour Stewart (1861). “On the Great Magnetic Disturbance Which Extended from 28 August to 7 September 1859, as Recorded by Photography at the Kew Observatory”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 151: 423–430. doi:10.1098/rstl.1861.0023JSTOR 108745.
  29. Jump up^ The Aurora Borealis; The Brilliant Display on Sunday Night. Phenomena Connected with the Event. Mr. Meriam’s Observations on the Aurora—E. M. Picks Up a Piece of the Auroral Light. The Aurora as Seen Elsewhere—Remarkable Electrical Effects New York Times, 30 August 1859, Tuesday; Page 1, 3087 words
  30. Jump up to:a b Auroa Australis; Magnificent Display on Friday Morning Mr. Merlam’s Opinions on the Bareul Light—One of his Friends Finds a Place of the Aurora on his Lion-corp. The Aurural Display in Boston. New York Times, 3 September 1859, Saturday; Page 4, 1150 words
  31. Jump up^ Auroral Phenomena; Remarkable Effect of the Aurora Upon the Telegraph Wires New York Times, 5 September 1859, Monday; Page 2, 1683 words
  32. Jump up to:a b Green, J; Boardsen, S; Odenwald, S; Humble, J; Pazamickas, K (2006). “Eyewitness reports of the great auroral storm of 1859”. Advances in Space Research 38 (2): 145–154. Bibcode:2006AdSpR..38..145G.doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.12.021.
  33. Jump up^ Ryerson, et al. The Late Aurora Borealis and the Telegraph, The Journal of Education for Upper Canada; 1859, p. 132
  34. Jump up^ The British Colonist, Vol. 2 No. 56, 19 October 1859, page 1, accessed online at, on 19 February 2009.
  35. Jump up^ Schield, M. A.; Freeman, J. W.; Dessler, A. J. (1969). “A Source for Field-Aligned Currents at Auroral Latitudes”. Journal of Geophysical Research 74: 247–256. Bibcode:1969JGR….74..247Sdoi:10.1029/JA074i001p00247.
  36. Jump up^ Armstrong, J. C.; Zmuda, A. J. (1973). “Triaxial magnetic measurements of field-aligned currents at 800 kilometers in the auroral region: Initial results”.Journal of Geophysical Research 78 (28): 6802–6807.Bibcode:1973JGR….78.6802Adoi:10.1029/JA078i028p06802.
  37. Jump up^ Persson, Hans (1963). “Electric field along a magnetic line of force in a low-density plasma”. Physics of Fluids 6 (12): 1756–1759.Bibcode:1963PhFl….6.1756Pdoi:10.1063/1.1711018.
  38. Jump up^ “Aurora Sounds Explained: High-Energy Particles Cause ‘Clapping’ Noises, Meteorologists Say”Huffington Post. 10 July 2012. Retrieved 15 March 2013.
  39. Jump up^ Mirsky, Steve (11 July 2012). “Northern Lights Make Noise, Too”Scientific American. Retrieved 15 March 2013.
  40. Jump up^ “Sounds of Northern Lights are born close to ground”Alaska Dispatch. 9 July 2012. Retrieved 13 May 2014.
  41. Jump up^ Unto, Laine (9 July 2012). “Sounds of Northern Lights are born close to ground”. Aalto University. Retrieved 24 August 2012.
  42. Jump up^ Deehr, C. (2012). “A Traveler’s Guide to the Aurora Borealis”Geophysical Institute (University of Alaska Fairbanks). Retrieved 15 March 2013.
  43. Jump up^ “News and information about meteor showers, solar flares, auroras, and near-Earth asteroids”. Archived from the original on 4 August 2010. Retrieved 5 August 2010.
  44. Jump up^ “Astronomical photographs from David Malin Images”. Retrieved 3 August 2010.
  45. Jump up^ “NOAA POES Auroral Activity”. Archived from the original on 28 July 2010. Retrieved 3 August 2010.
  46. Jump up^ “”. Archived from the original on 17 July 2011. Retrieved 26 July 2011.
  47. Jump up^ Aurora image (JPG)
  48. Jump up to:a b “ESA Portal – Mars Express discovers auroras on Mars”. 11 August 2004. Retrieved 5 August 2010.
  49. Jump up^ “Mars Express Finds Auroras on Mars”. Universe Today. 18 February 2006. Retrieved 5 August 2010.
  50. Jump up^ “Bullfinch’s Mythology”. 10 February 1996. Retrieved 5 August 2010.
  51. Jump up^ “The Aurora Borealis and the Vikings”. Retrieved 5 August 2010.
  52. Jump up^ “Norrsken history”. 12 November 2003. Archived from the original on 21 July 2011. Retrieved 26 July 2011.
  53. Jump up^ Hamacher, D.W. (2013). “Aurorae in Australian Aboriginal Traditions”.Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage 16 (2): 207–219.
  54. Jump up^ Aurora Borealis at the American Art Museum

External links[edit]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s